Neo-SSPX and Campos (+Rifan) condemns Bishop Williamson's Consecration

Campos (+Rifan) condemns Bishop Williamson's Consecration

of Fr. Jean Marie Faure


"Bishop Fernando Areas Rifan , a member of the Personal Apostolic Administration John Vianney in Campos of Goytacazes (municipality on the north of Rio de Janeiro), also condemns the ordination. Bishop Rifan is a representative of the traditional doctrine calls itself . " I am in communion with Bishop Edney [of Nova Friburgo. Note of Non Possumus blog ] . It is wrong that attitude of Dom Richard [Williamson] . He is in a schismatic attitude."
Bishop Rifan forgets that it was bishop Williamson who consecrated his predecessor, Bishop Licínio Rangel, on July of 1991? Why there is a schism now and not also then in 1991?

Source 1 and 2 

___________________________


Communiqué of the General House of the Society of St. Pius X concerning the episcopal consecration of Father Faure.


On March 19th 2015 Bishop Richard Williamson performed the episcopal consecration of Fr. Jean-Michel Faure at the Benedictine Monastery of the Holy Cross in Nova Friburgo, Brazil.


Bishop Williamson and Fr. Faure have not been members of the Society of St. Pius X since 2012 and 2014, respectively, because of their violent criticisms of any relations with the Roman authorities. According to them, such contacts were incompatible with the apostolic work of Archbishop Lefebvre.


The Society of St. Pius X regrets sincerely that this spirit of opposition has led to an episcopal consecration. In 1988 Archbishop Lefebvre had clearly indicated his intention to consecrate auxiliary bishops who would have no jurisdiction, because of the state of necessity in which the Society of St. Pius X and faithful Catholics found themselves at that time. His sole goal was to make available to the faithful the sacraments which priests ordained by the bishops would offer. After having done everything conceivable to gain permission from the Holy See, Archbishop Lefebvre proceeded with the solemn consecrations on June 30, 1988 before several thousand priests and faithful and hundreds of journalists from around the world. It was abundantly clear from all the circumstances that, despite the lack of authorization from Rome, this action done in the most public manner was for the good of the Church and of souls.


The Society of St. Pius X denounces this episcopal consecration of Father Faure, which, despite the assertions of both clerics concerned, is not at all comparable to the consecrations of 1988. All the declarations of Bishop Williamson and Fr. Faure prove abundantly that they no longer recognize the Roman authorities, except in a purely rhetorical manner.


The Society of St. Pius X still maintains that the present state of necessity renders legitimate its action throughout the world, without denying the legitimate authority of those for whom it continues to pray at every Mass. The Society intends to continue its work of priestly formation according to its statutes. It has every intention to keep the deposit of the Faith and the purity of the Church’s moral teaching, in opposition to errors, from wherever they may come, in order to pass on such Faith and morals in the traditional liturgy and by preaching, in accordance with the missionary spirit of its founder: Credidimus caritati [1 John 4:16].


Menzingen, March 19, 2015

Palestras do Rev. Padre Joaquim, FBMV

Apresento aos caros leitores essas magníficas palestras --separadas num total de 12 vídeos-- dadas por Padre Joaquim Daniel Maria de Sant'Ana, FBMV,  do Mosteiro de Nossa Senhora da Fé e do Rosário, Candeias/Bahia – Brasil; mas que foram proferidas no Mosteiro Beneditino da Santa Cruz em Nova Friburgo/RJ, no ano 2012 de NSJC.

Para quem deseja entender melhor a crise na Igreja e na Tradição, eu aconselharia muito escutar todas as palestras quando possível.




O restante da série de 12 vídeos podem ser vistos aqui:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUxmdVYfa6toHwqiv0LfVBRAZSKNEhhrZ

Sermão de Dom Tomás de Aquino sobre a Sagração Episcopal (Pregado no dia 17)

Dom Tomas Aquina's interview about the Consecration

March, 18 / 2015  (From Brazil)

Why a Consecration in 2015?   
by Dom Thomas Aquinas OSB



Why a consecration in 2015?


Because the situation remains essentially the same as in 1988. Modernist Rome, which manifested itself at the Council, remains in place and becomes more and more modernist and liberal. The profound perversion of the mind is only intensifying.



But why not wait for the Society of St. Pius X to give us bishops?


Because the authorities of the Society have taken a new direction in relations with Rome.



Do you mean to say that the Society has abandoned the true faith or the fight for the faith? 

I mean to say that the leaders of the Society have gradually in recent years, and especially since 2011 and 2012, taken a new direction in their relations with Rome.



But the question is whether or not the Society has abandoned the fight for the faith. What do you think? 
The particularity of liberals is inconsistency. The current leaders of the Society have made the fight of the Society inconsistent. The healthy part of the Society is trying to fight this battle as in the past, but the dominant wing, its Superior General at the top with Fr. Pfluger, persecute those who want to continue this fight as before.



Do you have any proof of that?
It is all too abundant. The refusal to ordain the Dominican and Capuchin candidates at the appointed time in 2012 is one. The Benedictines of Bellaigue were also threatened.
 But much more serious and significant was the scandalous expulsion of Bishop Williamson, preceded by the order to cease the Eleison Comments. In fact Menzingen does not tolerate us opposing its new orientation. Menzingen does not want us to publicly continue the fight for the faith as before, following Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop de Castro Mayer.
 The district priests are closely monitored and their articles cannot be published without quite strict permission.



But what harm is there in that? Every institution must monitor what is being said in its name!


Not like that. We must punish those who write against the Catholic faith, but not install a regime like the one Bishop Fellay already did.
 In addition, those with a liberal tendency have broad permission to write, while the book of Father Pivert is removed from sale. Le Sel de la Terre is frowned upon and removed from press stands. The most faithful priests are disavowed or even punished or expelled. 
Unfortunately, examples abound. The list is already long enough, while the GREC was able to work peacefully and Father Pfluger gives his scandalous interviews without being disturbed.

But there are good articles in Le Chardonnet, for example. Isn’t it wrong to say that the anti-liberals are persecuted in the Society?
Yes, there are still some good articles in Le Chardonnet, and not only in Le Chardonnet. Unfortunately, this is far from preventing the accordist tendency of Menzingen to move forward.

Do you mean, basically, that Menzingen is betraying the fight for the faith?


Yes, Menzingen is betraying the fight for the faith. That is why a consecration has become necessary to assure the continuity of the work of Archbishop Lefebvre, especially as Bishop Fellay now refuses to ordain candidates opposed to his policy, as is the case for several religious communities of men to whom he also refuses the Holy Oils (necessary to baptize children and give extreme unction to the dying). "We continue," very simply, as Archbishop Lefebvre used to say. And we believe that good Catholics support us from the bottom of their heart.
 If we seem to be too hard towards Menzingen, take the time to go through the long series of events that have marked the history of Tradition in recent years and you will see that the two most combative bishops of Tradition were, one, expelled from the Society, the other, silenced, at least in part. Added to this are the iniquitous trials of Fr. Pinaud and Fr. Salenave, and still so many facts.


What do you think about the candidate chosen?
He was chosen by Archbishop Lefebvre in 1988. He proposed another name. It is to his credit. Today he accepts this heavy burden. We are deeply grateful to him.
 To conclude, let us also and especially give our gratitude to Bishop Williamson who knew how to protect and transmit the legacy received from the hands of Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop de Castro Mayer, which is none other than the deposit of the faith entrusted by Our Lord to the Apostles. 
A final appeal. Read the works of Archbishop Lefebvre. Everything is there. Read also the Eleison Comments to understand the seriousness of the current evil.
 Corção said: "Only the saints believe in evil." Deep words which are a warning. May Our Lady help us to see the evil where it is, to work with her, she who has always crushed the head of the infernal serpent. "Ipsa conteret." That is the motto of the one who, God-willing, will tomorrow be Bishop Jean-Michel Faure. May Our Lady bless him and protect him "ad multos annos”.

***Credits to the members of Quebec Resistance